Anglicana

analysis coming

Well, much to my surprise, I ended up using Twitter and Facebook updates for just about all updates related to General Convention. As one gal on no one's payroll, that seemed best in the moment to communicate as much as possible about what was happening as it happened.

What I miss from Twitter-type updates is any kind of analysis or commentary. I still plan to offer that, but I'm doing something different this time around. The tweets were offered as cookie dough -- delicious, I hope, by the spoonful, and I hope at least some of you got to eat some Ben & Jerry's or Hagen Daaz with 'em. But rather than offer half-baked analysis, I'm going to get a little sleep and try to build up a reservoir of a few mental calories before I start blogging about what I think really happened and what I think it really means.

This is not the norm for the blogosphere, the greatest strength of which is generally the ability to get news and ideas out as quickly as possible. But somehow I'm feeling that the void left by The Witness' hiatus from publication was more about thoughtful and progressive analysis than it was about anything else. So that's my plan. And if you miss The Witness as much as I do, please drop me a line. The year 2017 would be The Witness' 100th anniversary, and I'd love to have a current copy in my hand (and/or on a screen) to toast the occasion.

Dr. Jenny Te Paa's address to the House of Deputies

Source: Episcopal Church Office of Public Affairs

Jenny Te Paa addresses House of Deputies
at the Episcopal Church General Convention

[July 12, 2009]  The following is the address presented by Jenny Te Paa, dean of Te Rau Kahikatea (College of St. John the Evangelist) in Auckland, New Zealand, on July 11 to the House of Deputies at the Episcopal Church 76th General Convention. (Video will be available on the Media Hub, http://gchub.episcopalchurch.org/)


Dr Jenny Plane Te Paa
On the occasion of the House of Deputies gathering at General Convention in Anaheim - July 2009

President of the House of Deputies, my sister my friend Bonnie, I along with my international colleagues are deeply honoured by your invitation to be here present at the 76th General Convention and by this privileged opportunity for us all to address the House of Deputies.

I pause momentarily and ask you all to note that President Bonnie has here represented Brazil, South Africa, Ghana, Kenya and Aotearoa New Zealand – what she has done of course is actually invite the true global south into your midst!

Sisters and brothers all of the House of Deputies, I bring you very warm greetings from the Primates, indeed from the Church of the Province of Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia. Ours is a Province, which has always prided itself on its global partners in mission relationships, on its Diocesan exchange relationships, on its ability and willingness to variously give generously and to receive graciously from among those 38 Provinces and 6 or 7 regional churches, which together comprise our beloved global Anglican Communion. Our enduring mutual affection for this The Episcopal Church is readily evidenced in the historical record.

We are as a Provincial Church both proudly autonomous and yet not to the extent that we cannot hear the cries of the poor beyond our own national gates. We are as a Provincial Church confidently relational and yet not to the extent that we render our unique identity ambivalent. We have in past times been bold in asserting what we see as necessary ‘innovations’ for our context and times. We have brought these respectfully to the councils of the global Anglican Communion and we have on occasion known the sharp sting of rebuff and rebuke. Many of you may not realize that my Province is the only one to ever have been officially censured by the Anglican Consultative Council. It was recent and was to do with our 1992 decision to revise our Constitution along what our critics claimed were ‘dangerously unprecedented racially prescriptive lines’!

The proposal lacks theological credibility said some. The proposal unjustly privileges one [racial] group over another, said others. We proceeded anyway, and we continue to live with faith and endless hope into the promises and the sometimes still untidy consequences of our rightful, timely and necessary decision.

We were at the time thankful for the opinions of others, we were appalled and saddened by others but at the end of the day we sought to proceed to do what we truly believed God was calling, urging, pleading with us to do, which was in our case to do with redeeming our Churches historic legacy of grave injustice toward minority indigenous peoples including indigenous or Maori Anglicans.

I see clear parallels here. Episcopal Church sisters and brothers, you too must follow your contextual spiritual conscience because in the first instance you have to live justly with yourselves in order that you can in turn and in time, live justly and in good faith with others in the Communion.

Permit me if you will at this point to offer a few observatory remarks.

Firstly a reflective comment on your polity. It is truly a formidable governance instrument, not in any oppressive sense but rather in its unequivocal demands for precision, in your attention to detail, in your faithfulness to procedure and in your deep concern for enabling appropriate consensus to emerge among and between your Houses.

Yours is a somewhat globally unique system and certainly it is one which holds in check, in fact preclude any tendency toward authoritarianism or autocratic presumption.

It may be worth my repeating here something I said the other day in my contribution to the Chicago Consultation luncheon event at which I spoke. I was sharing in all humility one of my deepest regrets (one that I know is shared by other Commissioners) that as members of the Lambeth Commission we were never fully apprised of the full facts of your polity and in particular of the limits to the power of the office of Presiding Bishop.

As a result of that crucial gap in knowledge and understanding it is my belief that the very unfair, in fact the odious myth of ‘The Episcopal Church acting (in the matter of the consecration of Bishop Gene Robinson) with typical unchecked US imperialism’, was more readily enabled and abetted to grow wings and fly unchecked for way too long across the reaches of the Anglican Communion.

It was only in hindsight as a number of us as Commissioners managed to catch our breath, to compare notes and to consult with our trusted Episcopal Church sisters and brothers that I realized, that we realized, to our utterly deserved chagrin that we had perhaps failed albeit inadvertently to prevent something of the unprecedented vilification of the Episcopal Church and especially of its leadership that inevitably resulted. (Here I want to pay special tribute to the careful and valuable teachings which Reverend Canon Brian Grieves and Reverend Ian Douglas so generously and patiently provided me during this period).

I share this with you not by way of exploiting the privilege of this public platform as a confessional site but rather by way of affirming with boundless respect and gratitude the truly mutually redemptive moment it is that you now enable us all to live into.

Your generosity of spirit in spite of all you have suffered so unjustly and unnecessarily over the past few years is just so perfectly admirable. That you continue with such magnanimity to gather international friends, to share with us so openly, so willingly all that you do so formidably, so precisely, so efficiently and so compassionately is a gift offering of such magnitude that it seems so utterly insufficient for me to simply say thank you, thank you, thank you.

If I could be so bold I want also to assure you that among ourselves as your international friends we are now all quietly urging you not to dwell unduly with any sense of uncertainty about your place within the global Anglican Communion. Sure the fearmongerers abound – they always have and they always will but surely our gaze must always be fixed beyond the horizon of fear and just as surely that gaze must always apprehend first and foremost the images of those who are the least among us.

Well we all bore such poignant and powerful witness to just where the gaze of this Church is the other evening, especially in the second half of the Global Economic Forum. We see that your gaze is clearly and justifiably so upon the plight of the first peoples of this land. Sarah Eagleheart’s very gracious ministry presence enjoined with what I have to notice are still surely way too few Native American delegates in this House, makes for very compelling, very urgently needed missional responses. Michael Schutt’s appeals for an end to environmental degradation are clearly unable to be ignored any longer. Dr Sizi’s extraordinary malarial preventive ministry work was simply overwhelming.

You must all claim with such pride all of these tangible, creditable and powerful missional commitments because they are but a tiny part of your incredible overall contribution to the building up of the global Anglican body of Christ. My sisters and brothers of The Episcopal Church, in the cause of local, national and global mission you are treasured and needed for the common good of the Anglican Communion.

Theological education is yet another example. At any one time there would be across the Episcopal Churches seminaries any number of students drawn from across the Anglican Communion studying at all levels of theological educational endeavour. As one such beneficiary myself I remain profoundly grateful for the gifts of knowledge and understanding, for the gifts of care and hospitality, of nurture and comfort I received from this Church during the time of my own doctoral studies at the Graduate Theological Union. My sisters and brothers of The Episcopal Church, in the cause of theological education you are treasured and needed for the common good of the Anglican Communion.

At the most recent meeting of the Anglican Consultative Council held in Jamaica, the impact and influence of the Communion’s Networks was for the first time very specially acknowledged and affirmed as being crucial to the very lifeblood of mission and ministry across the Anglican Communion. Because of my close association with at least five of these networks which have only been able to have impact and be influential as a direct result of the resourcing and generous trust of The Episcopal Church then once again, I say from a place of absolute sincerity to you my sisters and brothers of The Episcopal Church that in the cause of the precious ministries of the Communion’s networks, you are indeed treasured and so needed for the common good of the Anglican Communion.

Relationality is of course of necessity, a reciprocal matter – at least with an for those relationships where quality and longevity are seen as optimum components!

And so I come to what I trust will be received as a word of loving advice from your indigenous sister.

I come from a cultural context characterized still by the absolute urgency of cultural, linguistic, artistic, traditional survival. We indigenous peoples are in many ways understandably very protective of our culturally unique traditions, we are very conscious of the ways in which aspects of our traditions have become such beacons of light and hope in a world increasingly bereft of strong kinship networks, of strong familial identity, of meaningful spiritual regard for all of God’s creation. We have seen how attractive indigenous spirituality; in fact indigenous tradition in its many forms has suddenly assumed a level of contemporary interests and attractiveness. We have in all of this become desperately afraid of cultural appropriation and so as this intensely beautiful and endlessly complex concept of ‘ubuntu’ is uttered and claimed, explained and proclaimed I cannot help but wonder if all the necessary precautions against even unwitting appropriation have been taken?

Now as I said I offer this comment not by way of a criticism but rather by way of a word of loving advice from this your indigenous sister. I don’t know what precautions you may well have taken but if I may suggest, one of the markers which we indigenous peoples have found most helpful in these matters is to ask of those seeking to enter more fully into the very different socio, politico, spiritual, cultural worlds of ‘the constructed other’, are you intent on becoming one with or one of ‘the other’?

The most respectful of these options if of course the former. In this way we are each freed to become fully whom God created us to be and to flourish into that God given identity. The actions of one seeking to become ‘one with’ are those of selfless, sacrificial and loving solidarity whereas the actions of one seeking to become ‘one of’, are likely to be characterized by unashamed self-interest! The former option is thus more likely to be true ubuntu, but then I would not be so bold to determine such a thing! I simply raise a respectful cautionary flag.

My friends the time is now to go forward together into our shared faithfilled future. Let me once again say to you Bonnie, indeed to you here gathered as the House of Deputies, thank you for your abundant generosity, your enabling missional presence in God’s world through your significant contributions to the Christian life and witness of the global Anglican Communion.

Your invitation to your true global sought friends to be with you is so deeply appreciated, especially in this precious time of being and shaping and becoming ever more fully the body of Christ that God so tirelessly, so patiently wills us ever more to become!

Thank you so much for allowing me this time to speak with you.

# # # #

For more info contact:
Neva Rae Fox
Public Affairs Officer
The Episcopal Church
newsline@episcopalchurch.org<mailto:newsline@episcopalchurch.org>
212-716-6080  Mobile: 917-478-5659

or

Nancy Davidge
Media Liaison
The Episcopal Church
ndavidge@eds.edu<mailto:ndavidge@eds.edu>
617.901.4200

Director of Communications and Marketing
Episcopal Divinity School
99 Brattle Street, Cambridge, MA 02138
Office: 617.682.1502
Cell: 617.901.4200
ndavidge@eds.edu
www.eds.edu

leaflets allowed but barriers put up

Well, the convention center is now allowing leafleting (or at least security has not as of yet this morning chased away people distributing leaflets), but they've erected barriers something like what you'd see at amusement park rides to create clear corridors from the Hilton or street to the convention center doors. I'll put up a photo later if I get the chance, and assuming the barriers stay up. It's quite silly, though, since most people coming to convention WANT information about various views and candidates, so mostly the barriers are creating inconvenience. It's better than chasing us all away, at least.

convention center security forbids leafletting

This morning saw the release of the first issue of ISSUES, the daily newspaper of The Consultation. Distributing ISSUES is always fun -- many people actually WANT a copy, and so they're really pleased to see you when you've got a stack of them in hand. It's also an opportunity to say (well, I mostly inflict this bad pun only on friends), "hey ... I've got ISSUES. Want one?" And it's an opportunity to greet everyone as they file by for morning meetings and hang out with the wide diversity of people handing out various leaflets and newsletters.

This morning, though, convention center security forbade us all from distributing ISSUES -- or any other kind of leaflet, flyer, card, or newsletter -- on convention center property. I have no confirmation of this, but rumor has it that it's related to the fact that Disney hotel employees were outside the convention center as well asking for our prayers and trying to raise awareness of the myriad ways they're treated unjustly by Disney. So all of us were hustled away. There were chunks of sidewalk and street not too far from the convention center that are (I think) public property, so some of us just moved there. But those are far from the most heavy paths for foot traffic into the convention center.

What will come of all this remains to be seen, but it's ridiculous that convention-goers who WANT this material aren't allowed to pick it up from fellow convention-goers willing to stand on the sidewalk to offer it.

I hope we can work out an arrangement with security, as this is not acceptable.

Sarah Dylan Breuer, nominee for Executive Council

Sarah Dylan Breuer ("Dylan" to friends) has been nominated as a layperson for the Executive Council of The Episcopal Church. Dylan is:

A seasoned leader:

• Served as editor of The Witness magazine
• Past president of Gathering the Next Generation, TEC’s “Generation X” network, and steering committee member of The Consultation (www.theconsultation.org), a coalition of justice movements in TEC.
• Member of the Special Commission on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion, charged in the 2003-2006 triennium with preparing GC to respond to the Windsor Report
• Served on the 20/20 Task Force’s New Congregations team, 2000 - 2003 triennium
• Grassroots organizer with the Gamaliel Foundation, the Climate Project, and two successful union recognition campaigns.

Mission-minded, biblically grounded:

• Member of the Network of Ministry Innovators (NOMI), forming strategy for and support of creative and effective evangelism for the 21st century
• Author of “God’s Justice: A biblical perspective,” Chapter 1 of The Justice Project, ed. Brian McLaren, et al. (Baker Books, Sept. 2009)
• Ph.D. candidate in biblical studies; writer on Exodus, Luke, 1 Corinthians, Romans, and Philippians in Reflections for Daily Prayer (Church House Publishing, UK, Advent 2008 and Easter 2009)
• Served as a short-term missionary in Kenya.

Effectively communicating creative, fresh perspectives:

• Founder and author of SarahLaughed.net, a website providing resources on preaching and formation for over 18,000 faith leaders each week
• Creator of the U2charist, launched with Kathleen Capcara and the Rev. Ken Phelps in the Diocese of Maryland in 2004
• Author with the Rev. John de Beer of the Klesis Project, an innovative series of formation curricula made freely available online in ‘open source’ format for congregations from Alaska to Australia
• Active in the ‘emerging church’ movement and fluent in digital media and networking as well as in print and other traditional media.

Plays well with others!

• Contributor to the Covenant-Communion website as well as The Consultation’s ISSUES newsletter
• Commited to seek justice for all God’s children AND deepen relationships across the Communion to the furtherance of God’s mission.

Sarah Dylan Breuer lives with her partner, Karen, a high school teacher, in Boston. She loves playing guitar and ukulele, cooking, and hanging out with her two cats.

Dylan will be blogging/tweeting General Convention

I'll be at the whole of The Episocpal Church's General Convention, and will be blogging on it here on Anglicana as well as tweeting it. I'll also be contributing to ISSUES, the newsletter of The Consultation, so look for articles from me there!

For those going to Anaheim, see you there! For those following from a distance, see you online!

And if you'd like to help me cover expenses (hotel, air fare, buttons and flyers for election to Executive Council, and lost income, since my job gives me no vacation time or other paid leave), I'd be very grateful for anything you feel led to do. In the right-hand sidebar, you can click to donate via PayPal, or you can also help out by making any Amazon.com purchases by getting to Amazon.com via the "search Amazon" box in the sidebar. And if you or your church/business/etc. needs p.a. equipment, mics, or anything musical, please drop me a note with "Guitar Center" in the subject line, as I can ship equipment just about anywhere, get you a great deal, and earn a little money myself in the process.

Many thanks for your readership, your encouragement, and your support!

Dylan

Want to support Dylan's campaign for Executive Council?

I'm deeply grateful for all the support of SarahLaughed readers over the years. I'm particularly grateful at present to those of you who have written asking how you can support my campaign for Executive Council. Accepting nomination meant that I had to go to General Convention in Anaheim, and at my own expense. Nominees also need to come up with flyers and buttons (many do other kinds of swag as well). And my job at Guitar Center provides no paid leave.

Fortunately, y'all are a generous bunch! For those have asked how you can help, here are some ways:

1. Donate to SarahLaughed.net via PayPal. You can do this via credit card, though a small percentage fee is deducted if you donate that way, or you can send money via your PayPal account if you have one.

2. Send a check. If you'd like to do this, please address it to Sarah Dylan Breuer, SarahLaughed Ministries, 99 Brattle St., Cambridge, MA 02138.

3. Make your Amazon.com purchases after getting to Amazon.com via any link on SarahLaughed.net. I get a commission (usually 6%) from purchases made that way, whether I've linked to the specific product(s) purchased or not.

4. You can get SarahLaughed.net "swag with a mission" -- t-shirts, tote bags, and whatnot -- at the SarahLaughed Cafe Press store. My main reason for having a Cafe Press store was so people could get fun stuff that maybe -- just maybe could also do some non-obnoxious witnessing to what God is up to in the world, so I've kept prices there low, and for the most part I only make a dollar or two from each purchase. But every bit helps, and it's also generally a boon to me when people let their friends, colleagues, and others know about SarahLaughed.net.

Thanks again, and blessings!

Dylan

the decline (and fall?) of epiScope and ENS

I'm posting this here and on Grace Notes, as I'm really scratching my head here, and would be grateful for any sensible explanation of what's gone wrong and when and how it will be remedied.

I have two questions:

1) What happened to epiScope?

You remember epiScope -- the brilliant blog that kept us on top of news from around the world of interest to Anglicans, and that served as a valuable and amazingly timely corrective to errors made by the secular press (understandable errors -- the Anglican world is a complicated one requiring much nuancing to negotiate and communicate) in their coverage of The Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion.

Well, epiScope seems to be gone. I assumed at first it was because all of the resources of the Episcopal News Services (ENS) were concentrated on Lambeth, but that clearly isn't a good explanation because:

a) some of ENS's best and most senior reporters were not at Lambeth at all, and provided no coverage of it; and

b) the quality of epiScope has, if anything, continued to nose-dive after Lambeth.

I've stopped reading epiScope, as skimming its RSS feed, when I've bothered to do it (pretty easy to do, since it's not being updated anywhere near as frequently), has shown it mostly to be a regurgitation of ENS bulletins. That brings me to my next question:

2) What on earth has happened to the Episcopal News Service?

I have often joked that, much as certain flavored substances must, since they don't contain enough of the real thing, call themselves "cheese-food" or a syrup "full of chocolatey goodness," there are some television shows and paper publications that ought to call themselves "news-food" that is "full of newsy goodness."

ENS has, I'm surprised and sorry to say, become of late "news-food." Where's the news? Where's the analysis?

I've pretty much stopped reading ENS as well. I deeply respect Solange de Santis, whom I got to know a bit at General Convention in 2006. I wish her well in her new position. And I hope she can do something to revitalize ENS, which, to my eyes, took a sharp dive in quality just prior to Lambeth and has yet to recover. I hope she's embarking on a major course correction that would allow it to recover.

And while I'm thinking of it, that leads to a third question:

3) Where's the accountability?

I'm not even remotely close to the first person who has noticed these things. Was our Standing Commission on Communications consulted through or about whatever it is that's impeding ENS's effectiveness? Were a cross-section of Episcopal Communicators asked for feedback? What's been the feedback from secular media about the Church Center's effectiveness in helping them to cover accurately matters related to The Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion? Or has their feedback been sought?

How are decisions made regarding The Episcopal Church's communications, and where do the opinions of these people, and of ordinary Episcopalians, enter into such processes?

prophesy and interpretation

Bishop Duncan received this prophesy:

The Year of the Gate ---
Pass through, pass through the gates! Prepare the way for the people. Build up, build up the highway! Remove the stones. Raise a banner for the nations.
-- Isaiah 62:10

In Hebrew, the number eight is rendered by the letter CHET, which is depicted in the form of a GATE. The number eight is related to new starts and new life in the Scriptures – the most notable being the resurrection of Jesus which occurred on the eighth day… Eight is the number of the gate… And I sensed the Holy Spirit saying simply this:

2008 is the year of the open gate. Prepare to pass through the gate. There are new beginnings ahead for those who have been waiting patiently for their moment to come. Obstacles are being removed. The Father is breaking his children out of a sense of captivit y to past restrictions. The anointing for new beginnings is on many in this year. The time of frustration and exile is coming to an end. This is the Lord’s time for his people to rise up and follow him through the gates of opportunity. New star ts are looming. Many are on the point of experiencing the new life that convergence brings. And the true church – even though it will know many trials - is on the point of experiencing new life, a new season of vitality and creativit y, a brand new Reformation. A highway is being built, stones are being removed, and a banner is being raised for the nations. So get ready… and do not be afraid. Do not be anxious. 2008 is the year of the gate… And there is a BREAKER ANOINTING on those who are pushing up to the threshold of their opportunity: One who breaks open the way will go upbefore them; they will break through the gate and go out.Their king will pass through before them, the LORD at their head.
-- Micah 2:13

... about which Scott Allen posted to the listserv for bishops, deputies, and members of interim bodies of General Convention:

I thought Jesus was raised on the first day of the week, not the 8th (and the 3rd day after his death)....

To which I say:

Jesus was indeed raised from the dead on the third day, not the eighth, and therefore the correct interpretation of the prophesy obviously is that 2003, not 2008, is the year in which God anointed people to break barriers, remove obstacles, and open opportunities in the church for "those who have been waiting patiently for their moment to come." That seems to fit.

Either that or it means that Green Day -- green being the color of new life, and Green Day being a band with three members -- will win best record at the next Grammy awards, becoming the first punk band to do so and therefore opening the way for others and revitalizing the U.S. punk scene.

Oh, wait a second ... my band has three members too, and our first gig together was in March, the third month of the year! Clearly the prophesy is telling us that we are to play outside the gates of Harvard -- or maybe that we should approach Bill Gates for patronage. I hope it's the latter, as we really ought to get a P.A. system, a couple of monitors, and a vocal reverb unit before our friends get tired of us borrowing theirs for U2charists. Ooh, and I've had my eye on this instrument made by Reverend Guitars that's got three P90 pickups! Talk about a convergence of signs ...

Anyone have a phone number for Bill Gates? I hope he buys the guitar from me in orange, though of course I'd be happy to get the black, if that's the color God wants me to have. Funding from Bill Gates is going to open up so many opportunities ... clearly the moment for my band has arrived! Thanks be to God!

dropping the conference, leaving the GAFfes.

Archbishops Peter Jensen of Sydney and Peter Akinola of Nigeria have now met (separately) with Bishop Suheil Dawani of Jerusalem about GAFCON, the gathering proposed over this past Christmas for self-proclaimed "orthodox" bishops, clergy, and laity in Jerusalem. The organizers hadn't thought to meet with the Bishop of Jerusalem or with Mouneer Hanna Aris, the Primate of the Province of Jerusalem and the Middle East, before sending out a press release saying that the were holding a conference in his diocese, and as it turns out, neither one of these bishops of the chosen site for GAFCON are even remotely pleased about its being held there any more than they are about not having been consulted before the site was announced.

But now Jensen and Akinola have met with Dawani -- separately, despite the meetings being only three days apart -- and Thinking Anglicans has posted the minutes of those meetings, which make for very interesting reading.

Apparently Archbishop Akinola didn't take kindly to the objections of his host: "[Akinola] stressed that liberty was important for Africa and that he could not allow anyone to tell his community what to do and to say." At no point, according to the minutes, did he acknowledge his host's concerns; he apologized only "for sending his letter to Bishop Suheil at a very inconvenient time (at Christmas) and at such short notice, but he said that he could not see how this conference could become a 'political problem'." Nor did Akinola ask his host what he might respond to or ameliorate the concerns of Jerusalem's Primate, bishop, and people.

Instead, he tried another tack. "Archbishop Akinola then said, that this was a pilgrimage and wondered what the difference was to other pilgrimages. The Rev’d Canon Hosam responded by saying that this was not only a pilgrimage, since the Archbishop himself was talking about a conference with an agenda. Archbishop Akinola replied that he would be happy to change the terminology and refrain from calling it a conference, in which case he would call it a pilgrimage."

Hosam has a point. Clearly the event was intended from the start as a conference -- hence the name 'GAFCON," the Global Anglican Future Conference. The front page of the GAFCON website refers to it as a "conference" fifteen times, including in every header, while the word "pilgrimage" appears a grand total of three times. At least the organizers finally added the picture of one person of color (Archbishop Akinola); the first incarnation of the website, the domain of which was registered in Englishman Canon Chris Sugden's name, had pictures only of white men (Sugden, Jensen, and Bishop Bob Duncan of Pittsburgh).

In any case, none of the Jerusalem Christians present were going to buy the line that GAFCON isn't really a convention -- at least not as it's currently being organized. And so, although he hadn't been asked his opinion on what might help, Bishop Suheil rather generously offered a suggestion: that Akinola's agenda be spilt in two, with the conference taking place in Cyprus so what happened in Jerusalem could be a pilgrimage only.

That's what closed the meeting, with no response from Akinola, who had earlier "repeated that his interests were not political, and that his major concern was about how to grow and how to be strengthened and exchange experiences." I'm not surprised that he did not immediately accept Suheil's suggestion, or even promise to think about it. I'd say it was clear from the start that GAFCON was not only a conference, but a conference with political intent. My hunch is that organizers "immediately felt that [Jerusalem] was the right venue," as Jensen put it, because of the resonance they hoped edicts from that gathering would have as a kind of reconvening of the "apostolic council" in Jerusalem described in Acts 15.

Acts, however, describes "the whole group of those who believed" as being "of one heart and soul" (Acts 4:32), and it's clear that, not having consulted with the Jerusalem Christians before announcing a conference there, that GAFCON is not building that kind of community.

So who knows -- organizers may drop the "CON" from the name to further description of the event as not being a conference. It might be an even more appropriate name if they do -- the organization seems to have been nearly all gaffe thus far.